by Matt Leighninger
In March 2012, Elliot Shuford of the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review participated in a colloquium on deliberative democracy organized by the Participatory Governance Initiative of Arizona State University. In this interview with Participatory Governance Initiative co-director Daniel Schugurensky, Elliot recounts the history of the “Citizens’ Initiative Review,” explains how it works, and shares some of the main lessons learned.
He argues that ballot measures are often complex issues that have significant financial and social implications for taxpayers. Given that the stakes are so high, campaigns and interest groups spend millions on campaign tactics like poll-tested messages and sound bytes to shape the debate to their advantage.
Their goal is to get votes, and their tactics are primarily meant to influence, not necessarily to inform. He notes that in order to exercise responsibly the right to participate in direct democracy, voters should have reliable and clear information about ballot measures.
Related Articles
by Wendy Willis _____ As part of a program of Citizen University, DDC Director Wendy Willis partnered with several other organizations--Portland Underground Graduate School, Healthy Democracy, Oregon Humanities, Kitchen Table...
Before the whirlwind of the holidays, my friend and democracy- hero, Peter Levine, published a blog post entitled “why the deliberative democracy framework doesn’t quite work for me.” It made...
Hello Friends of Deliberative Democracy-- There’s no two ways about it. I've been out of touch lately. The months have just flown by. I promise a proper Bulletin soon, but in the...